Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Tim Scott has expressed support for maintaining U.S. foreign aid, particularly in contexts that align with U.S. interests and promote democracy abroad. He has emphasized the importance of U.S. involvement in global affairs.
Tim Scott has expressed support for maintaining U.S. foreign aid, particularly in contexts that align with U.S. interests and promote democracy abroad. He has emphasized the importance of U.S. involvement in global affairs.
Tim Scott advocates for maintaining a strong national defense and has expressed support for continued military presence in conflict zones. He has emphasized the need for a powerful military to deter adversaries.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Tim Scott advocates for maintaining a strong national defense and has expressed support for continued military presence in conflict zones. He has emphasized the need for a powerful military to deter adversaries.
Tim Scott supports strict immigration policies, including opposition to a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He advocates for stronger penalties for employers hiring illegal immigrants and emphasizes cultural assimilation, including making English the official language of the government.
Tim Scott supports strict immigration policies, including opposition to a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants. He advocates for stronger penalties for employers hiring illegal immigrants and emphasizes cultural assimilation, including making English the official language of the government.
Tim Scott advocates for reducing government intervention in the economy and supports tax cuts as a means to stimulate growth. He has opposed increasing taxes and has called for a balanced budget amendment.
Tim Scott advocates for reducing government intervention in the economy and supports tax cuts as a means to stimulate growth. He has opposed increasing taxes and has called for a balanced budget amendment.
Tim Scott describes himself as pro-life and has been a vocal opponent of abortion. He supports a 20-week federal abortion ban and has expressed opposition to taxpayer-funded abortion services. Scott has also indicated that he would sign a federal abortion ban into law if elected president.
Tim Scott describes himself as pro-life and has been a vocal opponent of abortion. He supports a 20-week federal abortion ban and has expressed opposition to taxpayer-funded abortion services. Scott has also indicated that he would sign a federal abortion ban into law if elected president.
Tim Scott has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has been critical of regulations that he believes hinder economic growth. He has signed pledges against climate taxes and supports energy independence through fossil fuel development.
Tim Scott has opposed federal action to cut emissions and has been critical of regulations that he believes hinder economic growth. He has signed pledges against climate taxes and supports energy independence through fossil fuel development.
Tim Scott opposes stricter gun regulations and supports the Second Amendment as a cornerstone of democracy. He has consistently voted against measures that would impose more restrictions on gun ownership and has advocated for loosening restrictions on gun purchases.
Tim Scott opposes stricter gun regulations and supports the Second Amendment as a cornerstone of democracy. He has consistently voted against measures that would impose more restrictions on gun ownership and has advocated for loosening restrictions on gun purchases.
Tim Scott believes in reducing taxes and opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners. He has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, committing to oppose any new taxes and supports a tax code that encourages growth.
Tim Scott believes in reducing taxes and opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners. He has signed the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, committing to oppose any new taxes and supports a tax code that encourages growth.
Tim Scott supports photo ID requirements for voting and has expressed opposition to Democratic voting rights legislation, which he believes would rig future elections. He has stated that claims of 'Jim Crow 2.0' are exaggerated compared to historical Jim Crow laws.
Tim Scott supports photo ID requirements for voting and has expressed opposition to Democratic voting rights legislation, which he believes would rig future elections. He has stated that claims of 'Jim Crow 2.0' are exaggerated compared to historical Jim Crow laws.
Tim Scott supports free trade agreements and has advocated for maintaining and modernizing trade agreements like NAFTA. He has expressed opposition to tariffs that could harm trade relationships.
Tim Scott supports free trade agreements and has advocated for maintaining and modernizing trade agreements like NAFTA. He has expressed opposition to tariffs that could harm trade relationships.
Tim Scott opposes same-sex marriage and has voted against legislation that would provide federal recognition of it. He has also co-sponsored a bill that would cut federal funding to schools unless they inform parents of changes regarding children's gender identity.
Tim Scott opposes same-sex marriage and has voted against legislation that would provide federal recognition of it. He has also co-sponsored a bill that would cut federal funding to schools unless they inform parents of changes regarding children's gender identity.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Healthcare, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns.
Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports the stated position by aiming to restrict federal funding for abortion providers.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Sanctuary City Elimination Act aligns with the stated position of strengthening penalties related to illegal immigration and promoting enforcement measures.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the Foreign-Trade Zone Export Enhancement Act supports the broader goals of free trade and enhancing trade agreements, aligning with the stated position on trade.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Cosponsoring the SHIPS for America Act indicates support for trade modernization and aligns with the position on maintaining trade agreements.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the act supports domestic manufacturing and aligns with the broader goal of modernizing trade agreements, though it does not directly address foreign purchases.
View source →Jul 21, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring the act aligns with the stated position by promoting taxpayer protection and accountability, which supports the broader goal of reducing federal taxes.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the act aims to address civil rights issues but does not align with the opposition to same-sex marriage and related legislation.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action does not clearly align with the stated position on immigration, as it is unclear how the Detention Authority Clarification Act relates to penalties for employers or pathways to citizenship.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1822-1823; text: CR S1823-1824)
Why: The action addresses illegal immigration by targeting drivers but does not clearly align with the stated opposition to a pathway to citizenship or the support for penalties against employers.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The IGO Anti-Boycott Act relates to trade but does not directly address the maintenance or modernization of trade agreements, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill addresses specific taxation rules for residents of Taiwan, which does not directly align with the opposition to increasing income tax rates, but it does not propose new taxes either.
View source →Jul 28, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: The action of sponsoring a bill related to credit access does not directly address tax policy, leaving the relationship to the stated position unclear.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1093)
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Nov 6, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Oct 8, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 16, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Sep 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jul 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Healthcare, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3052; text: CR S3061-3062)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 424.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2084-2085)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2057; text: CR S2056)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S716; text: CR S711)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S716; text: CR S710)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S397; text: CR S381)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Oct 29, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Sep 19, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S6798; text: CR S6795)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Aug 1, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 143.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 24, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jul 23, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Feb 13, 2025 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Committee consideration and Mark Up Session held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.