Sponsorship· HealthcareCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Murray emphasizes maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while also advocating for diplomatic engagement in foreign policy.
Murray emphasizes maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while also advocating for diplomatic engagement in foreign policy.
Murray supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having voted for comprehensive immigration reform and against measures that would restrict funding for sanctuary cities.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Murray supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having voted for comprehensive immigration reform and against measures that would restrict funding for sanctuary cities.
Murray supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as increased funding for education and infrastructure as part of economic recovery efforts.
Murray supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth, advocating for measures such as increased funding for education and infrastructure as part of economic recovery efforts.
Patty Murray supports legal access to abortion and has opposed various restrictions on abortion rights, including the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. She has stated that decisions about abortion should be made by women and their doctors, not politicians.
Patty Murray supports legal access to abortion and has opposed various restrictions on abortion rights, including the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. She has stated that decisions about abortion should be made by women and their doctors, not politicians.
Murray advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has criticized efforts to repeal the Clean Power Plan, arguing that it undermines scientific data and fails to address climate change effectively.
Murray advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has criticized efforts to repeal the Clean Power Plan, arguing that it undermines scientific data and fails to address climate change effectively.
Murray supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales and a national assault weapons ban. She has consistently voted in favor of gun control measures.
Murray supports stricter firearms regulation, including background checks for all firearm sales and a national assault weapons ban. She has consistently voted in favor of gun control measures.
Murray advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting measures to expand access to healthcare and negotiate drug prices under Medicare.
Murray advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting measures to expand access to healthcare and negotiate drug prices under Medicare.
Murray supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax policies that ensure the wealthy contribute their fair share to funding government programs.
Murray supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax policies that ensure the wealthy contribute their fair share to funding government programs.
Murray supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has consistently voted for measures that enhance educational funding and resources, including grants for local educational agencies.
Murray supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has consistently voted for measures that enhance educational funding and resources, including grants for local educational agencies.
Murray supports expanding ballot access and has voted against measures that would impose stricter voter ID requirements, advocating for easier access to voting.
Murray supports expanding ballot access and has voted against measures that would impose stricter voter ID requirements, advocating for easier access to voting.
Murray has voted in favor of stronger federal protections against discrimination, including supporting the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and measures to prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Murray has voted in favor of stronger federal protections against discrimination, including supporting the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act and measures to prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Position extraction pending on 6 issues: Foreign Policy, School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the SAFER Health Act, which aims to expand access to healthcare and regulate drug prices, directly advances the stated position of supporting a larger government role in health coverage.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Travel Fund Act directly supports access to abortion by facilitating travel for those seeking reproductive health services, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly supports the stated position of legal access to abortion by promoting the role of doctors and women in making healthcare decisions.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Cost Cap Act directly supports the stated position of expanding access to healthcare and regulating drug prices.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Training Act directly supports legal access to abortion by promoting training for healthcare providers, aligning closely with the stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that acknowledges discrimination against LGBT individuals and commits to equal rights directly supports the stated position of stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly supports the stated position on legal access to abortion.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position on abortion rights by promoting access to reproductive health care.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act directly supports the stated position by addressing the treatment of immigrant children and advocating for their welfare.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports the stated position of expanding voter access and ensuring fair voting practices.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S966)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that recognizes Abortion Provider Appreciation Day directly supports the stated position on abortion rights and acknowledges the role of providers in women's healthcare decisions.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act supports economic stability by addressing wage theft, which aligns with the broader goal of government intervention for economic growth.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the broader goal of stronger federal protections against discrimination, particularly for the LGBTQ community.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act supports increased educational resources, aligning with the stated position on federal funding for public schools.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S3061)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing the importance of educational opportunities aligns with the stated position of advocating for increased resources and support for education.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill for temporary protected status for Haiti aligns with the support for expanding protections for immigrants, though it focuses on a specific country rather than comprehensive reform.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to strengthen protections against child labor violations aligns with the broader commitment to civil rights and protections against discrimination.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the SAFE for Survivors Act indicates a commitment to healthcare access and protections, aligning with the stated position on expanding health insurance coverage.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the act supports healthcare access and addresses specific health needs, aligning with the broader commitment to expanding health insurance coverage.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1824-1825)
Why: The resolution addresses reproductive health and aims to improve maternal health outcomes, which aligns with the broader support for abortion rights and women's health decisions.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Find It Early Act, which aims to improve healthcare access and preventive services, aligns with the stated position of supporting expanded healthcare access.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Fair Wages for Home Care Workers Act supports healthcare access by addressing workforce issues in home care, which aligns with the broader goal of expanding health insurance coverage.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the Safe Step Act, which aims to improve access to healthcare by addressing step therapy protocols, aligns with the stated position of supporting healthcare access and expanding coverage.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: The DISCLOSE Act aims to improve transparency in campaign finance, which supports fair voting practices and aligns with the broader goal of enhancing voter access.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Affordable Care Act undermines the stated support for expanding access to healthcare.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish a fund aimed at preventing weaponization directly contradicts the stated support for stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 447.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution disapproving a Medicare rule undermines the support for expanding access and regulating healthcare, as it opposes a measure that could improve service efficiency.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 45 - 52. Record Vote Number: 190. (CR S3193)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove federal student loan regulations undermines the support for increased resources and funding for education, indicating a move against the stated position.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action involves disapproval of a rule related to child care funding, which does not directly align with the stated position on expanding healthcare access or regulating drug prices.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action involves disapproving a Medicare rule, which could align with concerns about access, but the specifics of the rule and its implications for healthcare access are unclear.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: The action relates to consumer protections in healthcare but does not directly advance the stated position on expanding access or negotiating drug prices, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3216-3217)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2351; text: CR S2379-2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2241; text: CR S2240-2241)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Armed Services. (text: CR S2083)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1619)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1202; text: CR S1208-1209)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.