Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Bennet supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing the importance of a robust military and intelligence framework to address global threats.
Bennet supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing the importance of a robust military and intelligence framework to address global threats.
Bennet supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having co-sponsored the DREAM Act and participated in comprehensive immigration reform efforts. He advocates for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, particularly those brought to the U.S. as children.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Bennet supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, having co-sponsored the DREAM Act and participated in comprehensive immigration reform efforts. He advocates for a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, particularly those brought to the U.S. as children.
Bennet supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth. He has proposed measures such as a child allowance and has emphasized the need for investment in infrastructure and job creation.
Bennet supports government intervention to promote economic stability and growth. He has proposed measures such as a child allowance and has emphasized the need for investment in infrastructure and job creation.
Michael Bennet supports legal access to abortion and has voted to continue federal funding for Planned Parenthood. He criticized the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, calling it an activist decision that demolished fifty years of precedent.
Michael Bennet supports legal access to abortion and has voted to continue federal funding for Planned Parenthood. He criticized the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, calling it an activist decision that demolished fifty years of precedent.
Bennet has expressed strong support for federal action to cut emissions and has been involved in various initiatives to address climate change. He was part of a bipartisan group that affirmed the need for bold action to tackle climate issues, following significant reports on climate change impacts.
Bennet has expressed strong support for federal action to cut emissions and has been involved in various initiatives to address climate change. He was part of a bipartisan group that affirmed the need for bold action to tackle climate issues, following significant reports on climate change impacts.
Bennet supports stricter firearms regulation, advocating for universal background checks and restrictions on high-capacity magazines. He has participated in efforts to reform gun laws in response to mass shootings and has a history of voting for measures aimed at enhancing gun control.
Bennet supports stricter firearms regulation, advocating for universal background checks and restrictions on high-capacity magazines. He has participated in efforts to reform gun laws in response to mass shootings and has a history of voting for measures aimed at enhancing gun control.
Bennet supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a public option alongside private insurance. He has proposed the 'Medicare X' plan to expand healthcare access while maintaining existing private insurance options.
Bennet supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for a public option alongside private insurance. He has proposed the 'Medicare X' plan to expand healthcare access while maintaining existing private insurance options.
Bennet supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax policies that target income inequality and provide relief for middle-class families. He has expressed the need for transparency in tax cuts and spending programs.
Bennet supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax policies that target income inequality and provide relief for middle-class families. He has expressed the need for transparency in tax cuts and spending programs.
Bennet advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has proposed measures to improve access to education and raise teacher pay. He emphasizes the importance of education in achieving economic growth and stability.
Bennet advocates for more federal funding for public schools and has proposed measures to improve access to education and raise teacher pay. He emphasizes the importance of education in achieving economic growth and stability.
Bennet supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to improve voting rights, including reforms to ensure fair and equitable access to the electoral process.
Bennet supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to improve voting rights, including reforms to ensure fair and equitable access to the electoral process.
Bennet has supported criminal justice reform, including measures aimed at reducing recidivism and mass incarceration. He is a sponsor of the bipartisan First Step reform bill, which seeks to address issues within the criminal justice system.
Bennet has supported criminal justice reform, including measures aimed at reducing recidivism and mass incarceration. He is a sponsor of the bipartisan First Step reform bill, which seeks to address issues within the criminal justice system.
Bennet supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including for LGBTQ individuals. He has co-sponsored the Equality Act and has expressed opposition to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Bennet supports stronger federal protections against discrimination, including for LGBTQ individuals. He has co-sponsored the Equality Act and has expressed opposition to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: Foreign Policy, School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly supports the stated position of legal access to abortion, aligning with efforts to protect and expand reproductive health care.
Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act directly supports increased funding for education, aligning with the stated position on enhancing federal support for public schools.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Keep Kids in School Act directly supports increased federal funding and access to education, aligning closely with the stated position on improving public schools.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
Why: Cosponsoring the resolution directly supports stronger protections for LGBTQ individuals, aligning perfectly with the stated position on civil rights.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated position of supporting legal access to abortion.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act directly supports humane treatment of migrants and aligns with the advocacy for comprehensive immigration reform.
View source →Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Cosponsoring the Absentee and Mail Voter Protection Act directly supports expanding voter access and aligns with the advocacy for federal standards to ensure fair elections.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the stated position of stronger protections against discrimination for LGBTQ individuals, though it is more symbolic than legislative.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the SAFER Health Act, which likely aims to improve healthcare access, aligns with the support for a larger government role in health coverage, even if it does not directly implement a public option.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3219)
Why: The resolution reaffirms commitment to immigrant communities, which aligns with the support for expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Sponsoring the Farmers’ Market Local Revitalization Act supports economic growth through local agriculture and community investment, aligning with the broader goal of government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The bill aims to provide financial support to farmers affected by irrigation issues, which aligns with the broader goal of economic stability and growth through government intervention.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The act focuses on mental health, which aligns with expanding healthcare access, though it does not directly address the public option or broader government role.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill for temporary protected status for Haiti aligns with the broader goal of expanding legal immigration pathways and providing protections for vulnerable populations.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Semiconductor Superiority Act supports economic growth through investment in technology and infrastructure, aligning with the stated position on government intervention for economic stability.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the PrEP Access and Coverage Act supports expanding healthcare access, aligning with the stated position on improving healthcare access and affordability.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the goal of improving healthcare access and affordability by promoting transparency in drug pricing, which supports the broader healthcare reform objectives.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Copays Act aligns with the goal of improving healthcare access and affordability, even if it does not directly establish a public option.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish a fund related to weaponization directly contradicts the stated support for stricter firearms regulation.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a rule related to the Affordable Care Act undermines the support for a larger government role in health coverage and contradicts the advocacy for expanding access.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The Small Farm Conservation Act may support environmental goals but does not directly address federal action to cut emissions, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The PASTEUR Act focuses on antibiotic innovation rather than directly expanding health coverage, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The PFAS Alternatives Act is related to health but does not directly advance the stated position on expanding government health coverage.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Foreign Relations. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (CR S2407)
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 403.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2177-2178)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 326.
Why: Tagged to Trade, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3216-3217)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on National Parks. Hearings held.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3024)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S4337-4338)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2086)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.