Sponsorship· Economy & JobsCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Cory Booker supports pursuing diplomatic engagement and international cooperation, emphasizing the need for strong alliances and a proactive approach to foreign relations.
Cory Booker supports pursuing diplomatic engagement and international cooperation, emphasizing the need for strong alliances and a proactive approach to foreign relations.
Cory Booker emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while advocating for diplomatic solutions to conflicts.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Cory Booker emphasizes the importance of maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while advocating for diplomatic solutions to conflicts.
Cory Booker supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for humane immigration policies that protect the rights of immigrants and refugees. He has been critical of harsh immigration enforcement measures.
Cory Booker supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, advocating for humane immigration policies that protect the rights of immigrants and refugees. He has been critical of harsh immigration enforcement measures.
Cory Booker supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for policies that promote job creation and economic equity.
Cory Booker supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, advocating for policies that promote job creation and economic equity.
Cory Booker supports legal access to abortion and has advocated for reproductive rights, emphasizing that women should have the ability to make decisions about their own bodies without restrictions. He has opposed limitations on abortion services and has called for the protection of access to safe and legal abortion.
Cory Booker supports legal access to abortion and has advocated for reproductive rights, emphasizing that women should have the ability to make decisions about their own bodies without restrictions. He has opposed limitations on abortion services and has called for the protection of access to safe and legal abortion.
Cory Booker advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported policies aimed at combating climate change, including rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement and promoting sustainable energy practices. He emphasizes the need for leadership in addressing climate issues.
Cory Booker advocates for federal action to cut emissions and has supported policies aimed at combating climate change, including rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement and promoting sustainable energy practices. He emphasizes the need for leadership in addressing climate issues.
Cory Booker supports stricter firearms regulation, including measures such as universal background checks and bans on assault weapons. He has called for comprehensive gun control reforms to address gun violence in the United States.
Cory Booker supports stricter firearms regulation, including measures such as universal background checks and bans on assault weapons. He has called for comprehensive gun control reforms to address gun violence in the United States.
Cory Booker advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the 'Medicare for All' initiative. He believes healthcare is a right and has pushed for reforms to improve access and affordability of healthcare services.
Cory Booker advocates for a larger government role in health coverage, supporting the 'Medicare for All' initiative. He believes healthcare is a right and has pushed for reforms to improve access and affordability of healthcare services.
Booker supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners to fund social programs and reduce income inequality, advocating for a fairer tax system.
Booker supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners to fund social programs and reduce income inequality, advocating for a fairer tax system.
Cory Booker supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for reforms that enhance educational opportunities, including free community college and loan forgiveness. He emphasizes the importance of equitable access to quality education for all students.
Cory Booker supports increasing federal funding for public schools and has advocated for reforms that enhance educational opportunities, including free community college and loan forgiveness. He emphasizes the importance of equitable access to quality education for all students.
Cory Booker supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to protect voting rights, including automatic voter registration and efforts to combat voter suppression. He emphasizes the importance of making voting accessible to all citizens.
Cory Booker supports expanding ballot access and has advocated for measures to protect voting rights, including automatic voter registration and efforts to combat voter suppression. He emphasizes the importance of making voting accessible to all citizens.
Cory Booker supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has been a vocal advocate for criminal justice reform, including the legalization of cannabis and ending the war on drugs. He has emphasized the need for a more equitable approach to drug policy.
Cory Booker supports reducing criminal penalties for drug offenses and has been a vocal advocate for criminal justice reform, including the legalization of cannabis and ending the war on drugs. He has emphasized the need for a more equitable approach to drug policy.
Booker advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, emphasizing the need for equal rights for all, including support for LGBTQ+ rights and initiatives to combat systemic racism.
Booker advocates for stronger federal protections against discrimination, emphasizing the need for equal rights for all, including support for LGBTQ+ rights and initiatives to combat systemic racism.
Position extraction pending on 4 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act directly supports economic stability and growth by addressing wage theft, which aligns with the advocacy for job creation and economic equity.
Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the PUPIL Act directly supports increased federal funding for public schools, aligning closely with the stated position on equitable education access.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Summer for All Act directly supports increased federal funding for educational initiatives, aligning closely with the stated position on equitable education access.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution that promotes the well-being of refugees aligns directly with the stated commitment to diplomatic engagement and international cooperation.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. (text: CR S2766-2768)
Why: The resolution directly acknowledges discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals and commits to pursuing equal rights, which aligns closely with the stated position of advocating for stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly supports the stated position of advocating for legal access to abortion without restrictions.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The Extinction Prevention Act aligns with aggressive climate policies by addressing biodiversity and environmental protections, supporting the transition to a green economy.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Reproductive Health Care Accessibility Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for federal protections and access to safe and legal abortion.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Sponsoring the Firearm Safety Act directly supports stricter gun control measures, aligning with the stated position on universal background checks and reducing gun violence.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Sponsoring the Sentencing Commission Improvements Act directly supports the stated goal of reforming sentencing laws, aligning with the broader agenda of reducing mass incarceration.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the broader commitment to LGBTQ rights and aligns with the advocacy for stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the SAFER Health Act indicates support for expanding healthcare access, which aligns with the advocacy for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Cost Cap Act aligns with the position advocating for a larger government role in health coverage, as it aims to address prescription drug prices within a government framework.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3219)
Why: The resolution reaffirms commitment to immigrant communities, which aligns with the support for expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Cosponsoring the EBOLA Act aligns with the emphasis on international cooperation and proactive foreign relations, as it involves addressing global health issues through diplomatic engagement.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act supports increased funding for education, which aligns with the advocacy for more federal funding for public schools.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill for temporary protected status for Haiti aligns with the broader support for immigrant rights and pathways, though it focuses on a specific country rather than comprehensive reform.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S2786-2791; Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2786)
Why: Cosponsoring the Make More in America Act indicates support for government intervention aimed at economic growth and job creation, aligning with the stated position.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act, which aims to improve access to affordable insulin, aligns with the broader goal of increasing government involvement in healthcare access and affordability.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The bill aims to study and report on the environmental impacts of AI data centers, which aligns with the broader goal of understanding and mitigating emissions related to new technologies.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2479)
Why: The concurrent resolution emphasizes reducing gun violence and strengthening public safety, which aligns with the support for stricter gun control measures, even though it does not propose specific legislative changes.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2175)
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to raise awareness about maternal mental health aligns with the broader commitment to healthcare as a right, though it does not directly advance single-payer healthcare.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Cosponsoring a study act related to watershed protection aligns with broader climate goals, even though it does not directly address aggressive climate change policies.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Maternal Health Pandemic Response Act is relevant to healthcare and supports improving maternal health, aligning with the broader goal of expanding healthcare access.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1824-1825)
Why: Sponsoring a resolution for Black Maternal Health Week aligns with advocating for reproductive health and reducing maternal mortality, which supports the broader context of abortion rights.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Sponsoring the Fair Wages for Incarcerated Workers Act aligns with the goal of reforming the criminal justice system by addressing labor conditions for incarcerated individuals.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish a fund related to weaponization directly contradicts the stated support for stricter firearms regulation.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to prohibit the federal death penalty contradicts the broader reform agenda that includes reducing incarceration and addressing punitive measures in the criminal justice system.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 447.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the support for a larger government role in health coverage, as it opposes a measure that could enhance Medicare services.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the commitment to single-payer healthcare and suggests opposition to expanding Medicare access.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The MOMMIES Act focuses on maternal health and may include aspects of government involvement in healthcare, but it does not directly address the broader support for single-payer healthcare or drug pricing.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses opioid treatment access, which relates to healthcare, but does not directly advance the stated support for a larger government role or single-payer healthcare.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to health policy but does not clearly advance or contradict the stated support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Green Ribbon Act's specific provisions are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns with or diverges from the support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action of cosponsoring a healthcare-related bill indicates engagement in the healthcare debate, but without specific details on the bill's provisions, it's unclear how it aligns with the support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The Small Farm Conservation Act may include elements related to conservation and emissions but does not directly address federal action to cut emissions as a primary focus.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: The action aims to promote public service in national parks, which can indirectly support environmental goals, but does not directly address emissions reduction or climate change policy.
Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2938-2939)
Why: The resolution acknowledges contributions to Black heritage and promotes access to education, but it does not directly address broader federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: While the act addresses privacy concerns in the workplace, its direct impact on federal protections against discrimination is unclear, making the relationship between the action and the stated position ambiguous.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The HARPOON Act's specifics are unclear from the summary, making it difficult to assess its alignment with the stated position on diplomatic engagement and cooperation.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The act focuses on restoring and preserving gun records, which does not directly advance the stated position of stricter firearms regulation, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action relates to healthcare through the establishment of an office and outreach program, but does not directly advance the stated support for single-payer healthcare or drug price reduction.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S709)
Why: The Medical Nutrition Therapy Act focuses on specific healthcare provisions but does not directly advance the broader single-payer healthcare goal, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The Moms Matter Act addresses maternal health, which aligns with healthcare access, but does not directly advance the single-payer healthcare position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 416.
Why: The action to cosponsor a public safety benefit program does not directly align with the stated reform agenda, as it focuses on benefits for law enforcement rather than addressing issues like drug policy or mass incarceration.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The action addresses women's health issues but does not directly advance the stated position of single-payer healthcare or lowering drug prices, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The VICTIM Act focuses on victims' rights and does not directly align with the stated support for criminal justice reform aimed at reducing incarceration and drug policy changes.
View source →Mar 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S1094-1095)
Why: The resolution acknowledges contributions to maternal and infant health, which aligns with healthcare advocacy, but does not directly advance single-payer healthcare or drug pricing reforms.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to discharge Senate Committee on Foreign Relations rejected by Yea-Nay Vote. 49 - 50. Record Vote Number: 118. (consideration: CR S2250-2255)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2270)
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2939)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1581-1582)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 406.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 412.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2313; text: CR S2310)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 326.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2177)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1609; text: CR S1617-1618)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.