Sponsorship· Gun PolicyCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Grassley supports maintaining strong national defense capabilities and has voted in favor of military funding and policies that enhance national security. He has expressed a commitment to ensuring the U.S. military remains robust and effective.
Grassley supports maintaining strong national defense capabilities and has voted in favor of military funding and policies that enhance national security. He has expressed a commitment to ensuring the U.S. military remains robust and effective.
Grassley has a strong anti-amnesty stance and has voted against comprehensive immigration reform. He supports building a fence along the Mexican border and has voted to limit welfare benefits for immigrants, indicating a preference for stricter immigration policies.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Grassley has a strong anti-amnesty stance and has voted against comprehensive immigration reform. He supports building a fence along the Mexican border and has voted to limit welfare benefits for immigrants, indicating a preference for stricter immigration policies.
Chuck Grassley considers himself pro-life and has expressed concern about federal funding for abortions. He has voted for measures that would allow states to regulate or ban abortion and supported the overturning of Roe v. Wade, stating it empowers people to make policy decisions through their elected representatives.
Chuck Grassley considers himself pro-life and has expressed concern about federal funding for abortions. He has voted for measures that would allow states to regulate or ban abortion and supported the overturning of Roe v. Wade, stating it empowers people to make policy decisions through their elected representatives.
Grassley has consistently supported gun rights, receiving high ratings from the NRA. He has opposed measures for stricter gun control, including background checks at gun shows and bans on high-capacity magazines, arguing instead for increased mental health care as a solution to gun violence.
Grassley has consistently supported gun rights, receiving high ratings from the NRA. He has opposed measures for stricter gun control, including background checks at gun shows and bans on high-capacity magazines, arguing instead for increased mental health care as a solution to gun violence.
Grassley opposes the Affordable Care Act and has voted for its repeal. He has expressed skepticism about government involvement in health care, advocating for limited government roles in health coverage and opposing measures that would negotiate drug prices for Medicare.
Grassley opposes the Affordable Care Act and has voted for its repeal. He has expressed skepticism about government involvement in health care, advocating for limited government roles in health coverage and opposing measures that would negotiate drug prices for Medicare.
Chuck Grassley has advocated for tax cuts and has voted against increasing taxes on corporations and top earners. He has a pro-business voting record and has supported measures that reduce corporate tax rates.
Chuck Grassley has advocated for tax cuts and has voted against increasing taxes on corporations and top earners. He has a pro-business voting record and has supported measures that reduce corporate tax rates.
Chuck Grassley supports requiring photo identification for voting in federal elections and has voted in favor of measures to establish stricter voter registration requirements. He believes these measures are necessary to ensure election integrity.
Chuck Grassley supports requiring photo identification for voting in federal elections and has voted in favor of measures to establish stricter voter registration requirements. He believes these measures are necessary to ensure election integrity.
Chuck Grassley supports free trade agreements and has voted in favor of various trade deals, believing they are essential for economic growth. He has consistently advocated for promoting free trade with countries like Peru, Oman, and in the context of CAFTA.
Chuck Grassley supports free trade agreements and has voted in favor of various trade deals, believing they are essential for economic growth. He has consistently advocated for promoting free trade with countries like Peru, Oman, and in the context of CAFTA.
Grassley has a mixed record on civil rights, having voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act and for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. He has also opposed adding sexual orientation to hate crime definitions, indicating a generally conservative stance on LGBTQ rights.
Grassley has a mixed record on civil rights, having voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act and for a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage. He has also opposed adding sexual orientation to hate crime definitions, indicating a generally conservative stance on LGBTQ rights.
Position extraction pending on 8 issues: Foreign Policy, Economy & Jobs, Climate, Education, School Curriculum, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns.
Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The bill to enhance penalties for firearm theft aligns with Grassley's support for gun policy that focuses on enforcement and accountability, even if it does not directly address broader gun control measures.
Apr 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 401.
Why: Cosponsoring the Protecting American Taxpayers Act aligns with the stated position by supporting tax relief measures, including the repeal of the estate tax, which is consistent with his advocacy for farmers and small business owners.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action of sponsoring a whistleblower support bill does not directly align with the stated position on repealing the estate tax, as it focuses on tax compliance rather than tax reduction.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Sponsoring a program aimed at rural hospitals does not directly align with the opposition to the ACA, but it also does not contradict it, as it may be seen as a separate healthcare initiative.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the INSULIN Act suggests a focus on healthcare affordability, which aligns with some aspects of healthcare access but does not directly support the ACA or its repeal.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: The CLEAR LABELS Act may align with some healthcare transparency goals, but it does not directly address the opposition to the ACA or its repeal, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Economy & Jobs, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Tech Regulation, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Voice Vote. (consideration: CR S2435; text: CR S2445)
Why: Tagged to Climate, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S1207)
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Feb 26, 2025 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 410.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 424.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 326.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Cloture motion on the motion to proceed withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate. (CR S2249)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S1745; text: CR S1744)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S1369-1370)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 10, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 347.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 9, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.