Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Van Hollen has called for conditioning U.S. military aid to Israel based on compliance with international law and has criticized the unconditional support provided to Israel. He advocates for a balanced approach that considers human rights and the pursuit of a two-state solution.
Van Hollen has called for conditioning U.S. military aid to Israel based on compliance with international law and has criticized the unconditional support provided to Israel. He advocates for a balanced approach that considers human rights and the pursuit of a two-state solution.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
He emphasizes maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while advocating for diplomatic engagement in foreign policy.
He emphasizes maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities while advocating for diplomatic engagement in foreign policy.
“Signed letter opposing Israeli annexation of territories.”
Chris Van Hollen supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has co-sponsored comprehensive immigration reform initiatives and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict immigration.
Chris Van Hollen supports expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways. He has co-sponsored comprehensive immigration reform initiatives and has consistently voted against measures that would restrict immigration.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Van Hollen advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth, supporting measures such as increasing the minimum wage and expanding the earned income tax credit.
Van Hollen advocates for government intervention to support economic stability and growth, supporting measures such as increasing the minimum wage and expanding the earned income tax credit.
“Proud to have supported the bipartisan infrastructure bill.”
Chris Van Hollen is a strong advocate for reproductive rights, supporting legal access to abortion. He has been an original co-sponsor of the Women's Health Protection Act and has consistently voted against measures that restrict abortion access, indicating a commitment to maintaining and expanding reproductive rights.
Chris Van Hollen is a strong advocate for reproductive rights, supporting legal access to abortion. He has been an original co-sponsor of the Women's Health Protection Act and has consistently voted against measures that restrict abortion access, indicating a commitment to maintaining and expanding reproductive rights.
“Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.”
Chris Van Hollen supports federal action to cut emissions and has received a 100% score from the League of Conservation Voters, indicating his commitment to environmental issues and climate change policy.
Chris Van Hollen supports federal action to cut emissions and has received a 100% score from the League of Conservation Voters, indicating his commitment to environmental issues and climate change policy.
Chris Van Hollen advocates for stricter firearms regulation, including universal background checks and a national assault weapon ban. He has been endorsed by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and has introduced legislation aimed at increasing gun licensing requirements.
Chris Van Hollen advocates for stricter firearms regulation, including universal background checks and a national assault weapon ban. He has been endorsed by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence and has introduced legislation aimed at increasing gun licensing requirements.
“Common sense measures like universal background checks.”
Chris Van Hollen supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for universal access to affordable health care and defending the Affordable Care Act. He has expressed support for Medicare for All, indicating a desire for expanded government involvement in health care.
Chris Van Hollen supports a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for universal access to affordable health care and defending the Affordable Care Act. He has expressed support for Medicare for All, indicating a desire for expanded government involvement in health care.
“Ensure universal access to affordable health care.”
Chris Van Hollen supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for progressive taxation. He has received a 100% rating from Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating his support for higher taxes on the wealthy.
Chris Van Hollen supports higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for progressive taxation. He has received a 100% rating from Citizens for Tax Justice, indicating his support for higher taxes on the wealthy.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
He supports more federal funding for public schools, advocating for universal pre-K and increased investment in public education.
He supports more federal funding for public schools, advocating for universal pre-K and increased investment in public education.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Chris Van Hollen is committed to expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, including automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that could suppress turnout.
Chris Van Hollen is committed to expanding ballot access and has supported measures to make voting easier, including automatic voter registration and opposing voter ID laws that could suppress turnout.
“Do everything we can to make it easier to vote.”
Van Hollen has actively supported stronger federal protections against discrimination, including voting for measures that prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation and advocating for gender and LGBTQ equality.
Van Hollen has actively supported stronger federal protections against discrimination, including voting for measures that prohibit job discrimination based on sexual orientation and advocating for gender and LGBTQ equality.
“Fighting for gender and LGBT equality.”
Position extraction pending on 5 issues: School Curriculum, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Let Doctors Provide Reproductive Health Care Act directly supports the stated position of advocating for legal access to abortion, aligning with his pro-choice stance.
Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Pell Grant Preservation and Expansion Act directly supports increased investment in education, aligning with the stated position on federal funding for public schools.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Summer for All Act aligns directly with the support for increased investment in public education, as it aims to enhance educational opportunities.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 100% by NARAL, indicating a pro-choice voting record.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to protect reproductive rights directly advances the stated commitment to legal access to abortion.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring the HELP Separated Children Act aligns with the support for comprehensive immigration reform and legal pathways for immigrants, as it addresses the welfare of separated children in the immigration system.
View source →Jan 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Sponsoring the Power for the People Act aligns directly with the commitment to reducing carbon emissions and promoting renewable energy, as it focuses on expanding access to clean energy.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services.
Why: Sponsoring the Protect Greenbury Point Conservation Area Act directly supports conservation efforts, aligning with the commitment to reducing carbon emissions and promoting renewable energy.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Ensure universal access to affordable health care.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Medicare Cost Cap Act indicates support for government involvement in healthcare, aligning with the advocacy for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3219)
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: The resolution reaffirms commitment to immigrant communities, which aligns with the support for expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3215-3216)
“Fighting for gender and LGBT equality.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution recognizing LGBTQ Pride Month supports the broader commitment to LGBTQ equality and civil rights, aligning with the stated position on stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Proud to have supported the bipartisan infrastructure bill.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act supports the stated position by addressing wage issues, which aligns with advocating for government intervention to enhance economic stability.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
“Rated 0% by FAIR, indicating a voting record loosening immigration.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill for temporary protected status for Haiti aligns with the broader support for expanding legal immigration pathways, as it facilitates protection for individuals from Haiti.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S2821)
“Proud to have supported the bipartisan infrastructure bill.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Stock Buyback Accountability Act aims to regulate corporate practices that can impact economic stability, aligning with the broader goal of government intervention for economic growth.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S2786-2791; Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2786)
“Proud to have supported the bipartisan infrastructure bill.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Make More in America Act aligns with the position of supporting government intervention for economic stability, as it likely includes measures to enhance economic growth.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring the Federal Flood Risk Management Act indicates a commitment to addressing climate-related risks, aligning with the stated position of supporting federal action to cut emissions.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Why: The bill focuses on studying and reporting environmental impacts, which aligns with the commitment to federal action on emissions and environmental issues.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The bill supports conservation efforts, which aligns with the broader goal of cutting emissions and addressing climate change, even if it does not directly focus on emissions reduction.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Cosponsoring the No Immunity for Glyphosate Act indicates support for regulating harmful chemicals, which aligns with the broader goal of reducing environmental harm and promoting climate action.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: Cosponsoring the act aligns with advocating for human rights in foreign assistance, reflecting a balanced approach to foreign aid.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ensure universal access to affordable health care.”
Why: Cosponsoring the Drug Deal Disclosure Act aligns with the stated position by promoting transparency in drug pricing, which supports the goal of lowering prescription drug prices.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2820-2821)
“Common sense measures like universal background checks.”
Why: Cosponsoring a bill to abolish the Anti-Weaponization Fund directly contradicts the stated commitment to stricter firearms regulation and reducing gun violence.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 431.
“Ensure universal access to affordable health care.”
Why: Cosponsoring a resolution to disapprove a Medicare rule undermines the stated support for a larger government role in health coverage, particularly regarding Medicare.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ensure universal access to affordable health care.”
Why: The action relates to health policy but does not clearly advance or undermine the stated support for a larger government role in health coverage.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2938-2939)
“Fighting for gender and LGBT equality.”
Why: The resolution acknowledges contributions of Black people and promotes access to music education, but it does not directly advance stronger federal protections against discrimination.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ensure universal access to affordable health care.”
Why: The action relates to health policy but does not directly advance the stated position on expanding government health coverage; its focus on PFAS alternatives is more environmental than healthcare-related.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: The action relates to education but does not directly address increased funding for public schools or universal pre-K, leaving the relationship unclear.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S2479)
“Common sense measures like universal background checks.”
Why: The resolution acknowledges the importance of reducing gun violence but does not propose specific gun control measures, leaving its alignment with the stated position unclear.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“Ensure universal access to affordable health care.”
Why: The SAFE for Survivors Act relates to healthcare access but does not directly address universal access or lower drug prices, leading to ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2177-2178)
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: The resolution addresses human rights and democracy, which aligns with the stated position's emphasis on these values, but it does not directly relate to conditioning military aid or the specific context of U.S. foreign aid.
Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: The action of cosponsoring a resolution to remove forces from hostilities in Iran does not directly align with or contradict the stated position on conditioning aid to Israel, reflecting a broader concern about military engagement rather than specific foreign aid policies.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: The cosponsorship of the PATH to the Foreign Service Act does not directly address the specific conditions on military aid to Israel, leaving the relationship between the action and the stated position unclear.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 415.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: The action addresses military involvement but does not directly relate to the conditions or balance in foreign aid to Israel, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated position.
View source →Apr 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: The action addresses military engagement but does not directly align with the stated position on conditioning aid to Israel, reflecting a broader concern about military actions rather than specific foreign aid policies.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: The action of sponsoring a resolution disapproving military sales to the UAE does not clearly align with or contradict the stated position on conditioning aid, as it addresses a different context of foreign military sales.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: Sponsoring the BRAVE Burma Act indicates engagement in foreign aid policy, but it does not directly address the specific stance on conditioning aid to Israel or the broader approach to U.S. foreign aid.
View source →Dec 10, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: The Commitment to Aid Workers Act focuses on supporting aid workers, which aligns with humanitarian efforts but does not directly address the conditionality of military aid to Israel or the stated balanced approach.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2897-2899)
“I support Israel’s need for security. But for too long most Democrats have unquestioningly accepted Israel’s argument that American weapons are needed and used solely for its defense.”
Why: Tagged to Foreign Policy, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 13, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Dec 4, 2025 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S8517; text: CR S8515-8516)
“For universal pre-K, invest in public schools.”
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 2, 2023 · Congress.gov
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Hearings held. Hearings printed: S.Hrg. 118-475.
“Rated 100% by the CTJ, indicating support of progressive taxation.”
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3194; text: CR S3218)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S3216-3217)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3052; text: CR S3061-3062)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations. (text: CR S2939)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2886; text: CR S2899)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 17, 2026 · Congress.gov
Held at the desk.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S4459)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 9, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 2, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S8278-8279)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations. (text: CR S2239)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203-2204)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 30, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2160; text: CR S2180-2181)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. (text: CR S2131)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
The motion to discharge fell when the point of order was well taken.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Motion to proceed to consideration of measure rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 47 - 53. Record Vote Number: 123. (consideration: CR S2265-2266)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jan 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. (text: CR S294)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Dec 11, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 7, 2025 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.