Sponsorship· AbortionCosponsor
Loading figure…
Loading figure…
Cassidy supports pursuing diplomatic engagement and international cooperation, particularly in relation to U.S. foreign aid and military alliances.
Cassidy supports pursuing diplomatic engagement and international cooperation, particularly in relation to U.S. foreign aid and military alliances.
Cassidy supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing the need for military readiness and alignment with national defense strategies.
How do you perceive this figure's political lean?
Community votes: Left 0% · Center 0% · Right 0% (0 votes)
Sign in to cast a vote.
Cassidy supports maintaining strong national defense and security capabilities, emphasizing the need for military readiness and alignment with national defense strategies.
Bill Cassidy opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, emphasizing the need for stricter border security and enforcement. He has criticized the current immigration system for rewarding illegal behavior and supports measures like a border wall.
Bill Cassidy opposes expanding legal immigration and asylum pathways, emphasizing the need for stricter border security and enforcement. He has criticized the current immigration system for rewarding illegal behavior and supports measures like a border wall.
Cassidy supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, as seen in his backing of bipartisan infrastructure bills and other economic measures.
Cassidy supports government intervention to support economic stability and growth, as seen in his backing of bipartisan infrastructure bills and other economic measures.
Bill Cassidy opposes legal access to abortion, supporting restrictions after 20 weeks and opposing any federal funding for abortion. He has stated that the overturning of Roe v. Wade recognizes the right to life of the unborn.
Bill Cassidy opposes legal access to abortion, supporting restrictions after 20 weeks and opposing any federal funding for abortion. He has stated that the overturning of Roe v. Wade recognizes the right to life of the unborn.
Cassidy supports federal action to cut emissions, as evidenced by his co-sponsorship of the Foreign Pollution Fee Act, which proposes a carbon tariff on imports based on their emissions.
Cassidy supports federal action to cut emissions, as evidenced by his co-sponsorship of the Foreign Pollution Fee Act, which proposes a carbon tariff on imports based on their emissions.
Bill Cassidy generally opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the constitutional right to bear arms. He has supported measures like the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act and has expressed openness to discussions on preventing gun violence, such as red-flag laws and expanded background checks.
Bill Cassidy generally opposes stricter firearms regulation, advocating for the constitutional right to bear arms. He has supported measures like the Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act and has expressed openness to discussions on preventing gun violence, such as red-flag laws and expanded background checks.
Bill Cassidy opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for private insurance solutions and criticizing government-run healthcare systems.
Bill Cassidy opposes a larger government role in health coverage, advocating for private insurance solutions and criticizing government-run healthcare systems.
Bill Cassidy opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and opposing the Inflation Reduction Act, which he claims raises taxes on the middle class. He has also supported the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, which commits to no new taxes.
Bill Cassidy opposes higher taxes on corporations and top earners, advocating for tax cuts and opposing the Inflation Reduction Act, which he claims raises taxes on the middle class. He has also supported the Taxpayer Protection Pledge, which commits to no new taxes.
Cassidy supports school choice and has advocated for policies that empower parents in education, but does not favor increased federal funding for public schools.
Cassidy supports school choice and has advocated for policies that empower parents in education, but does not favor increased federal funding for public schools.
Position extraction pending on 7 issues: School Curriculum, Voting Rights, Trade, Criminal Justice, Tech Regulation, Elections & Campaigns, Civil Rights.
Apr 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Cosponsoring the Title X Abortion Provider Prohibition Act directly supports the stated opposition to abortion and aligns with the position of restricting federal funding for abortion services.
Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Why: Sponsoring a bill aimed at improving access to neurosurgery for veterans aligns with a focus on healthcare access, even if it does not directly support government-run healthcare.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Sponsoring a bill to remove limitations on Medicare mental health inpatient care aligns with a focus on improving healthcare access, even if it does not support government-run healthcare.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Cosponsoring a bill that aims to protect oil and gas producers contradicts the stated support for climate action, as it may hinder efforts to reduce emissions.
View source →Most are procedural sponsorships or actions on issues where this figure hasn't publicly stated a position. Highest-signal entries shown first.
Jun 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action pertains to foreign policy but does not clearly advance or contradict the stated position on diplomatic engagement and cooperation, as its focus on shrimpers is not directly related to broader foreign policy goals.
View source →Jun 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Why: The action pertains to foreign policy but does not clearly advance or contradict the stated position on diplomatic engagement and cooperation, as its focus on shrimpers is not directly related to broader foreign policy goals.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: The action focuses on enhancing penalties related to firearm theft, which does not directly align with the stated opposition to gun control, yet it does not contradict the openness to discussions on preventing shootings.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
Why: The SOIL Act may relate to climate issues through agricultural practices, but its specific provisions and overall impact on emissions are unclear, creating ambiguity in alignment with the stated climate position.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The action involves sponsoring a bill related to forestry, which may have environmental implications, but does not directly advance the stated position on climate change or emissions regulation.
View source →Apr 27, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The ADVICE Act's focus on vaccine safety aligns with his emphasis on vaccines, but it does not directly address his opposition to government-run healthcare, creating ambiguity in alignment.
View source →Apr 21, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The INSIGHT Act's specifics are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns or diverges from the stated opposition to government-run healthcare.
Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The Mined in America Act focuses on domestic mining and does not directly address emissions or climate policy, creating ambiguity in its alignment with the stated support for climate initiatives.
View source →Mar 26, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: The SMART Act's specifics are unclear, making it difficult to determine if it aligns with or contradicts the opposition to government-run healthcare, leading to a mixed assessment.
View source →Mar 24, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: The act aims to improve kidney care access, which aligns with healthcare access goals, but does not directly address the opposition to government-run healthcare.
View source →Jun 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Tagged to Criminal Justice, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 14, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →May 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 29, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 354.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Apr 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Taxes, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 16, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Hearings held.
Why: Tagged to Education, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Tagged to Foreign Aid, but no stated position has been extracted for that issue yet — judgement deferred until more news coverage is available.
View source →Jun 22, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S3025; text: CR S2987-2988)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 15, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 8, 2026 · Congress.gov
Committee on Veterans' Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Jun 1, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2480; text: CR S2478-2479)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 20, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 19, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2381; text: CR S2380)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →May 11, 2026 · Congress.gov
Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2205; text: CR S2203)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Apr 28, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 25, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 23, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (text: CR S1546)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 18, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 12, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 5, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 4, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →Mar 3, 2026 · Congress.gov
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S8782)
Why: Couldn't tag this action to any of the tracked issues, so it can't be compared against a stated position.
View source →
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to start the discussion.
Sign in to join the discussion.